Nisa's accounts regarding sex and marriage show us that it is something that, in their culture, has to be done. There are several contrasts between marriage and sex in the San culture and in our culture. Today, we have more of a choice when it comes to marriage (and sex!). Women are becoming increasingly more independent and it is no longer believed that women need a man to take care of them, make money, bring home food, etc. The San culture is much more basic and, actually, it is much more realistic that the San women do need a man in order to help them hunt while they take care of the kids, for example. Nisa was very scared when she was to be married. As I would be also. The marriage is arranged and the girls are very young. She talks about how, at the end, she came to love and miss her husband, just like any other wife.
Nisa looks at God and the divine in kind of a critical manner. Throughout her interview, I did not see her thank God for anything but I did see her blame God for things such as death: "God is the one who destroys. It isn't people who do it. It is God himself." I found this to be interesting. I wonder if Nisa feels this way because of personal experiences that have occurred to her or if this is kind of more of a general way of San thinking? In regards to the healing rituals, Nisa does believe in the power of those. Again, she questions if the strange sensation that you feel while experiencing N/um is God's doing. However, she does view the healing powers and very good and very strong.
Overall, I think that Nisa's assessment of San life is perfectly realistic. That's kind of an interesting question to answer because of course, this being an interview of Nisa, everything will be described the way that she perceives things. And, ultimately, your perception is your reality. Therefore, her assessment is as realistic as it can get. To say that she made San life seem romantic or cynical would simply be our interpretation of something that we do not truly know or understand. For this reason, I cannot say that her description of a Paleolithic woman in the 20th century is anything but realistic.